User talk:165.127.14.3

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 165.127.14.3, is registered to State of Colorado General Government Computer and may be shared by multiple users of a government agency or facility, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation.

Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.

Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

January 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Jack Tate (politician) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Principles of Liberty Colorado (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Principles of Liberty Colorado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 165.127.14.3, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Principles of Liberty Colorado (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Check the guidelines about local non-profit organizations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Principles of Liberty Colorado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Not sure what this is all about but having lived in Medway all my life I can categorically say I've never heard of them and even if I had I still would've nominated anyway,
I'm not biased - I've nominated plenty of things in my area that aren't notable and will continue to do so in future if need be,
Anyway you can either go to the AFD and !vote Keep or Delete with a solid reason or simply move on and edit another article,
Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 20:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you watched The 51st State on Film 4 every other week? It opened at the UK box office at Number 2. Check IMDB. His books have been in the New York Times bestseller list. Just because you have never heard of someone does not make them non-notable. That's absurd.

No but even if I had we'd still be here now, I've never nominated an article in my life for that reason - There's many things I've not heard of but it doesn't mean I'd nominate it!,

As I said you can !vote on the AFD.... removing the AFD template under false reasons will get you blocked, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 21:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are vandalizing a page that has been here for literally years. And now you're abusing those of us who are fans of his work because you are ignorant and now locking us out. It's despicable behavior. Your privileges should be revoked.

Just because an article has been here for years doesn't mean it's a free pass to being kept - There's articles that have been here since WP started (2005ish) and still have been deleted, Nope you were removing the AFD template which is wp:disruptive editing hence why I got the article protected - It's your actions and behaviour that got the article protected. –Davey2010^Talk 21:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Stel Pavlou. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 20:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been talked to and you are abusing your position. Please cease immediately.

Now I've got the article protected hopefully you'll go to the AFD ....., And no I'm not abusing my position .... We have ways of doing things and your way isn't one of them. –Davey2010^Talk 21:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you've locked it. You know you're out and out wrong.

Nope the article was protected due to your disruptive editing (IE removing the AFD template), Had you not kept deleting it I wouldn't have to protect it so it's your fault it's protected not mine, I have no interest in point scoring here so either 1vote on the AFD or contribute elsewhere, Happy editing. –Davey2010^Talk 21:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. The problem is you, and you know it. It's really quite pathetic.

Recent edit to Kevin Grantham

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Kevin Grantham), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! MrBill3 (talk) 07:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Justin Everett has been reverted.
Your edit here to Justin Everett was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/EverettForColorado/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:50, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. - - mathmitch7 ^{(talk/contribs)} 14:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.